dimpledbrain

The conceptual framework for a man's search for meaning

dimpledbrain header image 4

Before you read further, pick 2 things from the list to categorize: cow, chicken and grass.

April 9th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

If you choose:

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · 12 Comments

Mirror oh mirror, which is the greatest of them all?

April 5th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

Have you ever wondered what is the driving force in man? There are people who are anchored in gadgets while others in power and authority. Compare the driving force in a tech junkie, a politician, a rich man and a monk.

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · 11 Comments

Why is the glass half full or half empty?

April 3rd, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

There is an old joke about H-A-B-I-T that if you take away H , you get A-BIT. If you remove A, you still have BIT and if you further remove B, you still have IT! Old habits die hard!

The same must be true for many other things. For example, there is a certain pattern as to how we process information and represent them. In NLP (Neuro-linguistic programming i.e. a milder version of hypnosis if you like ) this is called metaprogramme. I will discuss 5 major ones in this post.

(1) Outcome preferencemoving towards something or moving away

When we describe something, do we state ‘what we want’ or do we describe ‘what we don’t want’? Can you differentiate the following?

  • I like blue cars
  • I don’t like anything red

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · 10 Comments

What can we learn from Jack Welch?

April 3rd, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

Jack Welch of General Electric (GE) fame taught us 6 principles in life:

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · 6 Comments

What’s the big fuss about representational systems?

April 3rd, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

By now you have probably heard of representational systems in NLP

If you are not familiar, have a look at the picture below ( the arrow points at the direction of the eye movement, i.e. up, middle, down)

V – Visual – driven by what I see

A – Auditory – driven by what I hear

K – Kinesthetic – driven by what I feel

(image courtesy of Wikipedia)

Ignoring Ai (which I’ll talk about shortly) the image above is a typical right handed person facing you

(1) What is it like being a visual, auditory or kinesthetic person?

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · 10 Comments

Deep fundamentals

March 18th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

The 3 themes that will get more and more pronounced now and in the future are:

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · 58 Comments

Psychology of Influence

March 18th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

Robert Cialdini’s Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion is one of the best books I ever read on the subject, describing  in detail the factors behind influence

The 6 weapons of influence:

(1) reciprocity – if you offer help to someone, chances are he/she will feel obliged to reciprocate

  • Attack: how do you get someone’s help? In reality, I believe that’s why we tend to help others ( usually in the first instance)
  • Defend: when are the moments where you are manipulated to feel obliged to help others?

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · 3 Comments

What is 90% tit-for-tat?

March 17th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

We talked about game theory and the prisoner’s dilemma in the previous post (Click here for Part 1: Game theory in 5 minutes). The implication is real and thus it is vital that we understand the best approach to adopt in such situations

Recall that the problem with the prisoner’s dilemma is that one’s action is dependent on the other party’s action. Obviously the problem is we don’t know what’s the other person’s action is going to be! If only!

There are 2 distinctive scenarios here:

  1. one off circumstances
  2. repeated circumstances

[Read more →]

Tags:   · 13 Comments

Game theory in 5 minutes

March 17th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

The prisoner’s dilemma is a fundamental problem in game theory that demonstrates why two people might not cooperate even if it is in both their best interests to do so

Why? Refer to the following payoff table (scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest)

  1. Both cooperate – 3 points each
  2. One party cooperates and the other party defects
  • the one who defects = 5 points (reason: taking advantage of the one who cooperates)
  • the one who cooperates = 0 point (reason: being taken advantage of)

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · 11 Comments

The Conscious Competence Theory

March 17th, 2011 by dimpledbrain
Respond

The 4 stages of learning are:

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · 12 Comments

button-canoe
button-canoe
button-canoe
button-canoe